In a court an eyewitness testimony is taken as truth for a murder case, but if a guy says he saw an alien we think he is crazy…. Why do we take one eyewitness as truth and another as not ?
This is something that I think about as in science you need to prove something exists and make sure it is repeatable. Often though experiments are not duplicated independently. A murder trial cannot be duplicated, aka no one is making that scene again. We don’t believe in aliens, but a murder is plausible enough so we accept eyewitnesses.
Sometimes I just don’t have anything else to write after the statement. Above is simple statement, but it is something we should question both and find truth.
I would put a disclaimer here, but chose not to.