Category: Personal Growth (Page 5 of 7)

Do as I Say… Not as I do.

This is one of the classic parenting statements that everyone has once heard. I am not sure when my dad said it first, but I am sure I heard it a thousand times as a kid. The sad part is we learn from mimicking or copying someone, and I guess that statement has really lost its meaning.

It is almost a week since the Vegas Golden Knights won the Stanley Cup, and as always you start hearing about the injuries that players were playing with. The biggest was Mathew Tkachuk who could not even dress himself and played game 4 (he could not play game 5.). Even the teams that were eliminated earlier, Dougie Hamilton from my beloved New Jersey Devils, Linus Ulmark (from the top seeded Bruins and I am sure there were a lot more. Showing my age, the first story I heard about this was Jack Youngblood who played a Super Bowl in 1979 with a broken leg! But I start to look at these and wonder, this is what they do and not what people say.

What happens to our youth in sports, to coaches say ‘it’s not a bad injury so-and-so played with worse.’ or do kids not report injuries trying to mimic their favorite athletes? If you look at the top reasons why kids quit youth sports, number two is “Pressure to perform…and injuries that can result from overtraining due to that pressure to perform.” Second only to it is no longer fun. It does appear that we are ‘’doing what they do, and not what they say.”

This may appear to be outside of my normal writing, but take quick second and think is it really? My overriding theme of this blog is getting better every day, and the stories are lessons I learn along my journey on life. One statement I will stand by is some lessons need to be learned by self-failure, that it not possible to learn by being taught. Unfortunately, maybe this lesson is one that should not get to that point.

When my daughter was younger, she once got a concussion playing hockey. Although it was cleared by her doctor to play, I kept her out some extra time. Concussions and youth sports can be a complete discussion in itself, but I have done that with other injuries. I kept her out to ensure her long term health was insured. No injury is worth long term problems.

In professional sports though, there is this warrior mentality and as that article mentions, as long as the winning continues that people are ok with it. I wonder if anyone looks later at the wins and recognizes them as Pyrrhic Victories. I apologize for challenging my reader to remember High School history, but the comparison is valid. Are athletes at any age driving to victory so much but it’s not the team that suffers in the end, but the athlete. The pro athletes who play thru devastating injuries are not thinking of the lesson, this is their livelihood.

This is one challenge that I wonder if there is a solution for, I am not for regulating pro sports about athletes playing hurt. From experience I do know youth sports try to limit their liability but saying “you are not allowed to play hurt” but being involved in it, I have seen reality. I guess the only way to do this is for one to put themselves not in a position to teach your child (or coworker or friend etc.) never to say do what I say, not what I do. This means following your values in situations where you may sacrifice something.

This opinion is mine, and mine only, my current or former employers have nothing to do with it. I do not write for any financial gain, I do not take advertising and any product company listed was not done for payment. But if you do like what I write you can donate to the charity I support (with my wife who passed away in 2017) Morgan Stanley’s Children’s Hospital or donate to your favorite charity. I pay to host my site out of my own pocket, my intention is to keep it free. I do read all feedback, I mostly wont post any of them

This Blog is a labor of love, and was originally going to be a book. With the advent of being able to publish yourself on the web I chose this path. I will write many of these and not worry too much about grammar or spelling (I will try to come back later and fix it) but focus on content. I apologize in advance for my ADD as often topics may flip. I hope one day to turn this into a book and or a podcast, but for now it will remain a blog. Images without notes are created using and AI tool that allows me to reuse them, but zero content was written, corrected or modified by AI tools.

What James Webb Telescope reminded me of Bruce Lee

I have never shied away from stating that Bruce Lee has had an impact on my philosophy of life. Most people know him based on one or two quotes (Be Water) but he stated a juggernaut of ideas that most miss. Even the famous ‘Be Water’ quote is partially taken out of context, or people know only part of the quote. 

I have talked often about his movie Game Of Death, and its meaning, learning a lesson at each level in life to move to the next and finally reach enlightenment. I guess this lesson I knew but never really saw.  

Bruce introduced (and then closed) the world to a new martial art Jeet Kune Do as a way of taking other styles and merging them into one. He was one to learn as much of what he could from other styles and started to incorporate what worked. He found inefficiencies in using a style in a fighting scenario. His goal was not to have a style that you graduate by knowing katas but knowing how to apply in a fight. 

Bruce then closed the schools abruptly. The notion that the style was becoming something taught and documented went against his philosophy. What was that you said? Bruce believed the art of Jeet Kune Do was to constantly evolve and change as something new was discovered. The notion that it became fixed also was against his notion of Game of Death (constantly learning to get to the next step.) 

I didn’t think of this until the James Webb telescope findings started to disprove or challenge current scientific theories. So, what does Bruce Lee have to do with that? Scientists (or we should say good ones) are constantly looking to learn and either prove or disprove theories. They are not satisfied with the current answers. Bruce was never satisfied with his fighting style, he was always trying to improve. 

Why are we not looking at scientists when they admit they are wrong and celebrating it? Their current theories are based on knowledge they know at a point in time. All studies and theories should start with ‘To the best of our knowledge right now’ and ‘Here is the data to show it.’ The end of all studies should be, we will continue to learn and please challenge us.  

I talk often at work about answers being ‘point in time.’ Which is when someone asks questions about why something was done, I say rewind to that time and see the data you had to look at. The questions should be not why something was done, but what is the lesson we learned and could we found different data. Thinking like Bruce, who by this means was a scientist of martial arts and life, we continue to climb the tower of knowledge and understand the past and prepare better for the future. 

Funny I knew this before, I knew what he closed his schools, but I never matched it up to my life so easily and all because the James Webb Telescope is breaking modern science

This opinion is mine, and mine only, my current or former employers have nothing to do with it. I do not write for any financial gain, I do not take advertising and any product company listed was not done for payment. But if you do like what I write you can donate to the charity I support (with my wife who passed away in 2017) Morgan Stanley’s Children’s Hospital or donate to your favorite charity. I pay to host my site out of my own pocket, my intention is to keep it free.  I do read all feedback, I mostly wont post any of them

This Blog is a labor of love, and was originally going to be a book.  With the advent of being able to publish yourself on the web I chose this path.  I will write many of these and not worry too much about grammar or spelling (I will try to come back later and fix it) but focus on content.  I apologize in advance for my ADD as often topics may flip.  I hope one day to turn this into a book and or a podcast, but for now it will remain a blog.   Images without notes are created using and AI tool that allows me to reuse them. 

The Snowball effect….

For those who listen to Dave Ramsey or other financial podcasts the term Snowball is well understood. For those of you who never heard about it before, if you are in debt what you should do is pay off the smallest balance first (pay minimum in others) until that is paid off, and then go to the new ‘smallest balance.’ The downside is that you may pay more ‘interest’ but it gives you the quickest victory.  

In the world of agile there is a similarity called ‘Minimal Viable Product.’ Basically a MVP is what developers can build as fast as possible to give the users something they can use. The goal of course is a dopamine hit for the victory. 

As I was in meetings, and I looked at my personal life I started thinking. This notion of small victories can be applied more broadly. I look at my garage which somehow no matter how many times I clean it, turns out like a cyclone hits it. I dread cleaning it each time as it is a good 4-5 hours (my ADHD kicks in) project. So, I avoid it. What if I “snowballed it?” What if i just cleaned one shelf? Or just one area of a shelf. Would I get the dopamine hit to drive me to do more? Emptying out the whole garage is time consuming, do I need to do that?  

Are there other parts of my life that I struggle to tackle as they are bigger things? Looking at them not in the order that people would do them, but the order if easiest to hardest. Would I get things done?  

I understand that ADHD has certain traits including the fact we struggle with things that have no due date, that take a considerable amount of time and thus put things off. I once wrote about the Mark Twain theory of Eat a Frog, which is an alternative to the snowball method, and I did this a bunch. I have fallen into doing tasks that have less friction if I am honest with myself.  

I do not know the exact moment when the lightbulb went off that I connected the Snowball to Agile to day to day, and it doesn’t matter. Now the question is where to apply it first and see if it works. I guess I will let you know, but as the reader is there something that you are putting off that maybe the snowball would help solve? 

his opinion is mine, and mine only, my current or former employers have nothing to do with it. I do not write for any financial gain, I do not take advertising and any product company listed was not done for payment. But if you do like what I write you can donate to the charity I support (with my wife who passed away in 2017) Morgan Stanley’s Children’s Hospital or donate to your favorite charity. I pay to host my site out of my own pocket, my intention is to keep it free.  I do read all feedback, I mostly wont post any of them

This Blog is a labor of love, and was originally going to be a book.  With the advent of being able to publish yourself on the web I chose this path.  I will write many of these and not worry too much about grammar or spelling (I will try to come back later and fix it) but focus on content.  I apologize in advance for my ADD as often topics may flip.  I hope one day to turn this into a book and or a podcast, but for now it will remain a blog.   Images without notes are created using and AI tool that allows me to reuse them. 

The one person smiling … and AI

When I was in high school I tried out for plays and musicals. I had dreams of being on stage and becoming rich and famous (don’t most kids?). Those dreams were shattered as the Drama teacher (Mr. Vogel one of many teachers who helped shape me — and gets credit) needed me to do sound and lights. I was relegated to do geek stuff and I resembled that remark.

well not exactly teens — AI failure to generate correctly

During the rehearsals of musicals there were dance scenes and getting some 9th-12th graders with no dance training to dance was entertaining. Mr. Vogel knew a secret, that in a dance number with multiple people doing a synchronous choreographed routine that if you were out of step, missed a step if you kept smiling that people would think you were doing it right. The people who looked confused, looked at their feet or looked like they were concentrating too much were the ones that could be doing it wrong. If was the thought of confidence on stage that showed competence.

What does this have to do with AI? Using Chat-GPT or other tools they answer is such a confident manner that we believe what its generating is correct. In a previous post I spoke about this same idea of trusting blindly like a GPS and driving into a lake, I also have written about we trust Google also too much taking the first result as truth.

oops, my bad

A confident response does not mean it is factually correct, just like the dancer that is smiling, he may be out of step. Unless you know what the right dance move is supposed to be or the right fact you are being fooled by confidence. As a human we need to dig into our science background and question the result we are getting back to confirm the facts (as opposed to falsehood and confirmation bias.). Just ask the lawyer who used it to research a case and his only check was to ask GPT if it was lying.

There is a fear of AI taking over but the real fear is humans failing to think.

AI generating the thinking statue

This opinion is mine, and mine only, my current or former employers have nothing to do with it. I do not write for any financial gain, I do not take advertising and any product company listed was not done for payment. But if you do like what I write you can donate to the charity I support (with my wife who passed away in 2017) Morgan Stanley’s Children’s Hospital or donate to your favorite charity. I pay to host my site out of my own pocket, my intention is to keep it free.  I do read all feedback, I mostly wont post any of them

This Blog is a labor of love, and was originally going to be a book.  With the advent of being able to publish yourself on the web I chose this path.  I will write many of these and not worry too much about grammar or spelling (I will try to come back later and fix it) but focus on content.  I apologize in advance for my ADD as often topics may flip.  I hope one day to turn this into a book and or a podcast, but for now it will remain a blog.   Images without notes are created using and AI tool that allows me to reuse them.

Losing Value (What will AI reduce in value)

When I was young, I learned how to take photographs with a 35mm SLR camera, take the film out of camera, process it and create prints. I was fortunate my dad was interested in photography and built a lab in our basement. The cost of a picture was not cheap, the film, the processing, the time it took to do it all. Even for those who didn’t process their own pictures you needed to take them to a lab to get them turned into prints. Now there are polaroid cameras which were instant, but the costs were high. Of course, it got cheaper over time, and some fast processing but the costs of each picture and doing it was a challenge. 

In 1975 Kodak created the first camera and what followed was a slow reduction of costs in pictures. In 1989, the first commercially available digital camera to be released (Fuji) The cameras were expensive, the resolution started out very poor, but technology would advance. 

In 1997 a cell phone was released with a camera, and about the same time online photo sharing sites started going online. Ofoto, Shutterfly and DotPhoto allowed people to upload photos and share with others. Instead of printing pictures out and putting them in albums users could upload and share them. Camera companies had these smaller (pocket size) digital cameras trying to make it easier to get digital pictures, as well as they had ways to upload them. This was still time consuming and took some technical skill. 

In 2006 Facebook was available to all users (over 13), Twitter came out and in 2010 Instagram was released. Even though social networks were around before this, it wasn’t till these three figured out how to get mobile photos that were about to change.  

Well thanks for the history lesson, Larry, but I could have gotten that all from Wikipedia, in fact it might be more correct. Absolutely and you should check my work, but believing everything you see on the internet is another post. Let us connect the dots, people have phone which now has a good enough camera, (yeah, I didn’t put the iPhone in there, but you know when that came out) companies have made it easier to get those photos online (social media etc.) so the result was people started taking more pictures with very little friction (cost, knowledge etc.)  

The cost of taking pictures from the old days of film cameras you had to buy, get film, get it developed etc. had diminished to zero. Photography had crossed the chasm from just a few to mass adoption. Before you only took pictures at moments (how many birthday pictures do you have from the 60-70s) now you take pictures at almost every meal. If fact, my camera roll has so many pictures there is no way I can ever look at them all. The days of sitting on a couch and going thru a photo album pretty much is over.  

What does his have to do with AI? Over the last few months as you play with Chat GPT and other tools and some people look at it for what jobs it will take away, others look at the damage it can possibly do and lastly those who want to figure out how to get the best out of them. The one point I think about is what is this going to make so cheap its worthless. To me over time many things have hit this. 

  • Photography (as mentioned) 
  • SPAM (well mail) when you can email something at no cost, vs price of a stamp 
  • Travel, Food etc, Guides. Remember buying books on places to travel 
  • Navigation, remember going to AAA and getting a trip-tick? 
  • Chilton’s Car repair guides. A simple YouTube search has made this really free 
  • Wikipedia killed Encyclopedias  
  • No one knows what cliff / monarch notes are 
  • Why don’t you add your own… 

What is General AI going to make worth less. First, it is not 100% correct. Pre-Chat-GPT a google search required you to read some links and decide what a good answer (or confirmation bias) to your question is. I wrote about AI being the next GPS and proof is this article about a lawyer who not only used ChatGPT for his case, but he only check the sources by asking ChatGPT if it was lying.  

Though not sure anyone saw the photo becoming worthless now we don’t need to think if it is worth taking a picture as the cost is zero. With AI, we can only wait to see what makes it so friction free (writing stories, creating images etc.) that there is little value. I see the productivity gains leveraging it (images for this blog, coding etc.) and be watching to see.  

I love and hate what happened to photography. But looking at the list of things that are free/frictionless and most of this made my life better so now I will continue to experiment and find the next thing that will be friction free. 

This opinion is mine, and mine only, my current or former employers have nothing to do with it. I do not write for any financial gain, I do not take advertising and any product company listed was not done for payment. But if you do like what I write you can donate to the charity I support (with my wife who passed away in 2017) Morgan Stanley’s Children’s Hospital or donate to your favorite charity. I pay to host my site out of my own pocket, my intention is to keep it free.  I do read all feedback, I mostly wont post any of them

This Blog is a labor of love, and was originally going to be a book.  With the advent of being able to publish yourself on the web I chose this path.  I will write many of these and not worry too much about grammar or spelling (I will try to come back later and fix it) but focus on content.  I apologize in advance for my ADD as often topics may flip.  I hope one day to turn this into a book and or a podcast, but for now it will remain a blog.  

Geoffrey Moore was right about the Chasm

One of my favorite books’ pre-dates the wonderful Dot-Com explosion and bubble, and one of my favorite authors has a book that I find places to apply the ideas in that one book. I wrote previously about Cult is the root of culture, but I really missed a single point.  

Changing culture is done in large corporations by having a marketing campaign and creating presentations about change. Maybe finding one or two senior managers who can act as ‘change agents.’ Does this work? (Maybe you should answer that question not me.) 

What Geoffrey Moore talks about in his book has to do with innovation, but I believe anytime there is a needed change the model works well. His book describes the diffusion of innovations which goes back to 1962 by Everett Rogers.  

Yep it’s a bell curve… And as much as people gripe and moan it works. Everyone thinks they are good drivers, but realistically most of us are somewhere in the average. But this curve has two far ends, one with innovators (Steve Jobs, Elon Musk etc.) as the top say 2-3% and the next 10-15% as early adopters (those standing in line to get some new tech.). The rest (the 68% of the people in the above average/below average) and the people trailing are going to wait till whatever change has crossed the chasm.  

That first 12-18% who are willing to change are the people that you need to focus on. If you are trying to change culture, change a process, change anything, these are the people who are willing to take the risk. You need to find those people, and work only with only those people. Treat it like new tech that is ‘invite only’ an exclusive club. If you get that first generation to change the notion of that exclusivity adds to the FOMO (Fear of Missing Out.). The middle 68% will see the success of that top group and will want in.  

Finding those people depends on what you are trying to change, but obviously anyone who pushes back is not one of those people. And as said make it invite only, and even better make it a challenge to get into the group (so they want to be there) will help drive the desire to make the change. This is not easy, and others will say change is not easy period. But using the diffusion of innovation will give you a chance to succeed, more than any marketing campaign for people who say ‘I will wait to see if anyone else gets it to work’. 

So if you want change, culture, style of work or other find the visionaries have them help build the change, find the early adopters get them on board and the rest will eventually follow.

This opinion is mine, and mine only, my current or former employers have nothing to do with it. I do not write for any financial gain, I do not take advertising and any product company listed was not done for payment. But if you do like what I write you can donate to the charity I support (with my wife who passed away in 2017) Morgan Stanley’s Children’s Hospital or donate to your favorite charity. I pay to host my site out of my own pocket, my intention is to keep it free.  I do read all feedback, I mostly wont post any of them

This Blog is a labor of love, and was originally going to be a book.  With the advent of being able to publish yourself on the web I chose this path.  I will write many of these and not worry too much about grammar or spelling (I will try to come back later and fix it) but focus on content.  I apologize in advance for my ADD as often topics may flip.  I hope one day to turn this into a book and or a podcast, but for now it will remain a blog.   New Images are created using AI with license to use.

Do you need a fall back plan to chase your dreams?

When I was in college, I did take a sideways direction as I realized I was not talented enough to be a professional musician but had the brains to manage bands. I took a course given in NYC about it, and there was so much information it blew my mind. The presenter (I apologize this was 87 I do not remember his name) had some interesting advice, sometimes it was contradictory. 

In the section about working with a band and the band needing to ‘self-fund themselves’ he told the story about one band that took one of the members grandmother’s fudge recipes and started selling it to fund the band. The idea was to give the band enough time to practice full time do chase their dreams. The band did not make it but ended up opening a fudge store as a full-time gig (I had to chase that down later.) Thank God I did not quit my day job…. Well, like George. 

In recent days conversations with my daughters touched on do they have a backup plan if they do not get into Med or PA school. In this case I was the pragmatic father and wanting to make sure they had a plan b. This also could be related to my up brining where my parents wanted to make sure I had a stable job etc. I could chase dreams, but my mom always said have a plan b, c, d….  

Reading what I had written previously, I noticed I wrote about Failing at something you don’t like as a reason to chase your dreams. In a research project the notion of having a fallback plan has some drawbacks. So, the downsides? 

  • Not going ‘All In’ on your dream reduces the effort you can put in 
  • Wasting resources on backup plan that could be used on your primary plan 
  • Apparently just thinking about a backup plan reduces your chance for success 
  • Falling into your backup plan due to the sunk cost fallacy 

Now the studies talk about how people just think about goals, or in some cases have small ‘monetary’ incentives. Looking back at my desire to be in the music business, I did focus a lot on a Plan B (like my mom told me.) Would I have made it with Plan A? I really do not know, but my focus on Plan B took me far. 

Now back to what I told my kids. The first make your mistakes in your 20s (well now) It is much easier to find an alternate path if you make the mistake now. Trust that you have the resources (parents/friends) to help you out, and your own abilities to find your Plan B. So, you will not hit FIRE at 40, finding happiness and your place in this world may be more important than retiring early.  

And now to think about how to do this at work. Many times, I have been asked if there is a Plan B, and now my response should be if we focus on it, it may turn into Plan A. 

This opinion is mine, and mine only, my current or former employers have nothing to do with it. I do not write for any financial gain, I do not take advertising and any product company listed was not done for payment. But if you do like what I write you can donate to the charity I support (with my wife who passed away in 2017) Morgan Stanley’s Children’s Hospital or donate to your favorite charity. I pay to host my site out of my own pocket, my intention is to keep it free. I do read all feedback, I mostly wont post any of them

This Blog is a labor of love, and was originally going to be a book.  With the advent of being able to publish yourself on the web I chose this path.  I will write many of these and not worry too much about grammar or spelling (I will try to come back later and fix it) but focus on content.  I apologize in advance for my ADD as often topics may flip.  I hope one day to turn this into a book and or a podcast, but for now it will remain a blog.

Agile and the New Pair Programming Paradigm with GPT-AI

Yes, I know for the last hundred plus posts it has been about getting better. But over the last four months I got into playing around with AI. Well, I hate to call it AI, GPT is a better name (Generative Pre-trained Transformer.) The speed of announcements and actual tools are coming so fast it boggles the mind. 

First if you do not know the history of Agile, nor read the Extreme Programming Explained book, please google that, and get some back history. One key concept in EPE is the notion of pair programming, where two developers sit together to work on a single piece of code. There is a lot of good to this, one developer can catch the other typos, opine on unit tests, and in many cases two brains are better than one. This part of Agile is what I am going to say should change based on the tools I have played with. Note I have no investment in any of these tools and will focus on the free ones for this writing. 

So, the outcome of pair programming is better code quality, faster problem solving, knowledge sharing (no single point of failure) and reduced on boarding time. A developer can be productive from day one via pair programming. 

Now pair programming does have some negatives. Finding two developers that work well together is not easy, even finding a programmer that ‘wants a partner’ is hard enough to find. Add scheduling, developers working remote (Covid) and some companies having global presence. There are even more reasons why pair programming did not take off,  

Now the curve ball, along comes Chat-GPT. And even a non-programmer can send a simple request and it will spill out code. No developer needed! Now, of course, the problem is making sure that code works, does what it says it does, has all the non-functional requirements etc. With us geeks (programmers) we have got our hands on some new tools. Codeium, Code Whisperer, Git Hub CoPilot etc. show up. And presto we now have tools to help us code. Of course, they suffer from some bad reasoning that GPT tools have. 

Some of the tools (Codeium) have a ‘chat function’ where you can ask it to write code. And let’s say now you have the business user sitting with you and giving you, some requirements (user stories) and you translate it to the correct prompts. The tool writes some code, as a developer you can enrich the code. The next step is to ask the tool to write test cases, and presto they are done.  

Of course, a developer can choose to write code and allow the tools to give suggestions to speed up the coding and correct mistakes. Again, no need for the second developer to do that. Let the GPT do these things for you. The tool is available all the time, does not have to worry about sick days, regions etc. These tools are also faster than the second programmer and can make the changes in real time where the second programmer will have to say, ‘correct your mistake.’ One last key feature is it can enforce standards (naming, design etc.)  

All of this at much less cost than the second programmer. For the same costs (about) the second programmer can be working on something else with his/her own coding tools.  

Now Agile may change, not just pair programming, but think of moving to Kanban where now the product owner (or a delegate) sits with the developer and just talks through ideas while the coder developers in real time. The possibility of productivity gain is unreal.  

There are some downsides as these tools do not have a record of accomplishment yet, setting it up for your code only, or sandboxing is coming to prevent your ideas and code being ingested in a public GPT must be perfected. And as my joke said, sometimes the idea can be completely wrong (hence the need for the first programmer.) 

I see the positives and wonder how soon it may become reality. There is this push of AI dangers, the possible loss of jobs etc. but I prefer to figure out how to use it to get better. 

This opinion is mine, and mine only, my current or former employers have nothing to do with it. I do not write for any financial gain, I do not take advertising and any product company listed was not done for payment. But if you do like what I write you can donate to the charity I support (with my wife who passed away in 2017) Morgan Stanley’s Children’s Hospital or donate to your favorite charity. I pay to host my site out of my own pocket, my intention is to keep it free. I do read all feedback, I mostly wont post any of them

This Blog is a labor of love, and was originally going to be a book.  With the advent of being able to publish yourself on the web I chose this path.  I will write many of these and not worry too much about grammar or spelling (I will try to come back later and fix it) but focus on content.  I apologize in advance for my ADD as often topics may flip.  I hope one day to turn this into a book and or a podcast, but for now it will remain a blog.

Can you act like a Child in a Meeting?

One of my favorite movies (ok top 100 somewhere) is ‘Big’ with Tom Hanks. Tom is a 12-year-old boy that based on a wish turns into an adult, and well must ‘adult.’ It is another one of those “put a person in situation they don’t understand movie” – and yes everyone could guess the plot. But is a scene that as an adult I realize had a message all its own. 

Big – I don’t get it.

In this scene Tom Hanks is sitting in a meeting and while a marketing person makes their pitch on something that is obviously stupid no one is responding. Everyone is nodding like sheep as they understand the pitch, not willing to be the one person who questions it. Hanks puts his hand up, and just says “I don’t get it.” And in the following parts, you can see most of the people in the room did not get it. The scary thing, it was technically a 12-year-old who is willing to raise their hand. 

In large corporate meetings I see this all the time. People nod, and since we are on zoom you can see them message someone “do you have any idea what they are talking about.” Somehow the fear is beating out of us to question things. Funny little kids will ask thousands of questions, as they are curious. Somehow by the end of school and entering the real world we do not lose the curiosity but lose the willingness to stand out. 

What is your record for consecutive questions…

In the above scene this should be acceptable. Asking all the questions until everyone understands or all the information is out. Unbelievably, I have often asked the questions when someone has sent me a team message, they do not get it. Believe me, if you do not get it, I guarantee more people in the meeting also do not get it. This is one time we should act like a child; this is one example where adulting is not better.  

I am not going to go into how or why this notion of being able to question in a large group is beaten out of us, but more trying to beat into you that it is a habit that we should re-learn. Even if you understand what a presenter is talking about, and you think someone does not, step up. You will help others. To me there is no harm in being ignorant, there is a harm in not trying to educate to remove ignorance. 

As a speaker, sometimes you need to read your audience. Silence does not mean understanding or acceptance. Silence often means dissent or confusion. Just like a band/DJ needs to read a audience to get people dancing etc. as a presenter you need to read your audience. Sometimes it could include saying, “I don’t think I explained that perfectly, let me try another way.” And restart, or even better instead of asking “Any questions?” pick someone in the group and say, “can you explain it back to me?” This accomplishes two things, making sure they get it, and making sure they understood what you said. (That may need to be another blog post) 

So act Big…. well not really act like a child.

This opinion is mine, and mine only, my current or former employers have nothing to do with it. I do not write for any financial gain, I do not take advertising and any product company listed was not done for payment. But if you do like what I write you can donate to the charity I support (with my wife who passed away in 2017) Morgan Stanley’s Children’s Hospital or donate to your favorite charity. I pay to host my site out of my own pocket, my intention is to keep it free.  I do read all feedback, I mostly wont post any of them

This Blog is a labor of love, and was originally going to be a book.  With the advent of being able to publish yourself on the web I chose this path.  I will write many of these and not worry too much about grammar or spelling (I will try to come back later and fix it) but focus on content.  I apologize in advance for my ADD as often topics may flip.  I hope one day to turn this into a book and or a podcast, but for now it will remain a blog.  

The Next Digital Divide…

I was in my early teens and my dad drove me up to some electronic store in Fairfield NJ. We came home with a Franklin Ace 1000. It was an Apple clone, how my dad even knew about it, or knew what this purchase would lead to is beyond me. Not only did he get me the 1000, but somehow, we ended up getting a modem (hard to remember I think it was a micromodem ][ or something.) I was one of the few people in the early 80s (Think it was 1983) to have a computer.  

I was 15 or 16 at the time and had no idea what the digital divide was. I knew I was one of the few people in my town that had a computer, and in those days your town was the world. Communicating with people across town, let alone across the country or in other countries was not the norm. It didn’t take long for me to figure out how to use the modem and connect to BBS’s. Yeah, for you youngsters there was something before the internet. I won’t go into GENIE, Prodigy and other internet services that are for others to chat about. 

What I didn’t know was I was splitting away from those who didn’t have access to one. That my career was right in front of me. What I thought was cool was that a few of us had started what would be the first digital divide. As I got older and had kids of my own, my kids got laptops at a young age continuing to add to the advantage. I knew it was an advantage and being a good parent, I wanted my kids to have one.  

During my adulthood I was involved in the second digital divide; high speed internet (or even internet at all.) For those who had it got access to information that others struggled to get. Free internet at libraries does not equate to those who had it at home. Even during 2019-202x during Covid – that families that had high speed internet at home got access to schools and materials at home that others didn’t. Some were even fortunate they could work from home.  

But now I see one coming. Learning how to use Generative AI tools. From what appears to be a parlor trick and something to write cool wrap songs in Shakespeare format G-AI tools seem to be the in thing. Some people seem afraid of what it is going to do and want a pause, others saying we need to “understand” it before we let it out, G-AI will take our jobs and even more fear mongering.  

But what I see is how I interact with it. If you ask simple questions, you get nonsense, but if you learn to ask the right questions with enough detail the answers get better. If you play with other tools like Codeium or github Copilot start to see that it increases productivity. To the point I may not be a developer, but assembler of code snippets that the tools suggest. This is the new divide (well it is in two parts.) 

First you need to know how to ask questions. For Chat-GPT (or any other G-AI Tool) the better you ask your question the better the response. If you learn the right way to put data together and ask for the analysis or response you will get one that is better than someone asking a simple question. For developers it is how you phrase a comment, or name something and Codeium/CoPilot takes over. Developers who know the business can ask the right questions do not have to be the best coders. It almost becomes who asks the right questions, who can direct the tools will be the most productive. Those who don’t have command of the language or see G-AI as a parlor trick or as something going to take their job will be left behind. 

Second, companies that do not look at ways to get these tools in. Oh, I know there are risks of sending data out and code leaks hence the ‘look at ways’ to get these tools in well they may get left behind. Companies need to look at ways to use their data, their information, or information they can ingest to gain an advantage. Things like a G-AI wont replace a Dr. Companies can’t be like Samsung and issues like this one. Companies that don’t figure it out may be left behind. Just like those less fortunate to learn how to interact with it, the 3rd Divide is upon us.  

The Skillset of the future is knowing how to interact with G-AI as well as how to get to the right data set in the G-AI that you are using. If not, others will. 

This opinion is mine, and mine only, my current or former employers have nothing to do with it. I do not write for any financial gain, I do not take advertising and any product company listed was not done for payment. But if you do like what I write you can donate to the charity I support (with my wife who passed away in 2017) Morgan Stanley’s Children’s Hospital or donate to your favorite charity. I pay to host my site out of my own pocket, my intention is to keep it free.  I do read all feedback, I mostly wont post any of them 

This Blog is a labor of love, and was originally going to be a book.  With the advent of being able to publish yourself on the web I chose this path.  I will write many of these and not worry too much about grammar or spelling (I will try to come back later and fix it) but focus on content.  I apologize in advance for my ADD as often topics may flip.  I hope one day to turn this into a book and or a podcast, but for now it will remain a blog. 

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 LrAu

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑